The main audience for the game should be:

user warning: Table './agoraxchange/accesslog' is marked as crashed and should be repaired query: INSERT INTO accesslog (title, path, url, hostname, uid, sid, timer, timestamp) values('Decrees', 'node/11', '', '38.107.191.103', 0, '8cb1c8c16ebc93a4e56375a98f9fd6bb', 307, 1268204904) in /var/www/html/includes/database.mysql.inc on line 172.
in

Login to vote in this poll.

On May 28th, 2008 McLovin said:

There should be no limit to the main audience for this game to take hold. I think a pluralistic model is needed in order to encompass the full capacities of political relations to build. This means taking in all forms of different fields of expertise, whether it be those adroit in the digital media, students with different educational backgrounds, activists with various agendas, and artists with their own aesthetic preferences. Only then can there be a perplexing and informative illustration of how this digital world works.

On June 2nd, 2008 skeadie said:

I agree that "all citizens" should be allowed to participate in this game for similar reasons - the game will only reach its full potential if limitless voices are heard and diverse participants recognized. However, I wonder if, in starting the game, a player should state his or her 'title' in today's society - whether a 'video game player,' an 'activist,' a 'student,' or an 'artist' - because then we could understand that person's beliefs and behavior in context. The audience should be limitless in order to allow people with very different experiences to interact, but should they also be anonymous?